top of page

Threats that are not threats


After the missile attack on the largest children's clinic "Akhmatdit", Belarusian propagandists followed the Russians to whitewash the occupying army, once again declaring that it strikes only for military purposes and, of course, cannot aim at a children's hospital.


We do not take into account whether this was a deliberate attack on the clinic, or whether imported replacement electronics failed, confusing "Okhmatdit" with the "Azov" base - the Russian Federation still bears full responsibility for this terrorist attack. Let's just remind you that very recently, on April 26, the head of the KGB, Lukashenka, personally and publicly threatened to attack hospitals in Kyiv, because some terrorists are allegedly hiding there.


A direct quote from Ivan Tertel's speech at the "All-Belarusian People's Assembly"-2023:


"All these persons and their plans are known to us. In the fight against terrorism, we operate according to the laws of wartime. There are killed and wounded among the terrorists, they will be punished, it was not for nothing that they chose the Kiev hospital as their den at Bogatyrskaya 30-32, where they hid behind the backs of sick children.


After these words, the city authorities of Kyiv were forced to contact the SBU and organize the evacuation of small patients, their mothers and doctors from two buildings. After all, who knows what is really going on in the minds of non-humans who can express such threats.


Mayor Vitali Klitschko personally reported on the progress of the evacuation at the time, recording a video near the hospital: "The doctors are acting in a coordinated manner, the ambulances are transporting patients to other hospitals in the city." We do everything to protect. children, their parents, adult patients and staff from a possible attack."


So how can all this be connected with the denial that the occupiers allegedly "do not pose any threat to civilians"?

Comments


bottom of page